1
 
  Rules & Regulations

 

ATL Rules

Rules of Tennis

Code of Tennis

Knotty Problems

Division Assignments



How the Austin Tennis League (ATL) Committee Places Teams in Divisions



Goal of Team Placement Process
To place each team in a division each season where the team will have competitive matches.  The ATL Committee's team placement goal is extremely simple in concept: Assess each team's average strength and place each team in a division where it will have competitive matches.  The difficulty is in determining average team strength.  The success of the placement process depends on the ATL Committee's ability to accurately assess team strength.  Generally, the ATL Committee determines average team strength by:
  • Team performance in past seasons and roster stability
  • Changes in league composition
  • Accuracy of the each player's USTA rating
  • Assessment of each player's performance in past seasons
These strategies and tools are discussed below.

Team performance in past seasons and roster stability
Each team returning to ATL has a performance history from past seasons.  A team's record is a good indicator of how that team might be expected to perform in an upcoming season, assuming the team's roster remains relatively stable.  Teams with major roster changes cannot be judged on history alone.  And the placement of brand-new teams can be tricky if none of the players have results in ATL matches.  While it can be a good indicator, historical information on team performance can vary, especially among some teams that retain little more than their team names from one season to the next.  Each season before the placement meeting, the ATL Committee compares each returning team's roster with its roster from the previous season to determine where changes, if any, have occurred.  The committee assesses several aspects of roster stability: Who is returning to the team, and how did those players perform the past season?  Who is no longer on the team, and how did those players perform?  What new players have been added, and are there any results for these new players - ATL or otherwise - that indicate how those new players might perform in ATL?

Changes in league composition
Captains often assume that each team finishing first in a division will automatically move up to the next higher division in the succeeding season (and vice-versa for the last-place team).  However, that assumes that each team and all the others in the league remain static.  League composition can change drastically from season to season.  New teams join the league each season, others drop out, and some teams make wholesale changes in their rosters.  Even if one team's roster remains static, that team's placement may depend more on the changes in other teams since these other changes can affect overall league composition.  Team placement depends more on each team's strength relative to all other teams in the league.

Accuracy of the each player's USTA rating
The ATL Committee relies on every team's ability to list the accurate rating of each player on its roster.  It is easier to place teams if all players on a roster have a published USTA rating.  (Go to to view the results for players with published USTA ratings.)  Published ratings can be a good indicator of an individual's playing ability, especially against Austin area competition.  Self-ratings vary in accuracy since they rely on a person's ability to assess their skills against a sliding scale of stroke mechanics (NTRP Ratings).  Self-ratings do not reflect a player's performance in actual matches.  Finally, most players familiar with USTA published ratings understand that there can be wide variations in ability, even for players with the same rating (e.g., all 3.5-rated players are not equal).

An individual player's performance in past seasons
The ATL Committee also reviews each player's performance in ATL matches, especially in the most recently completed season (Player Performance History).  ATL player records reveal not only match results but also frequency of participation.  The records provide the committee with information on how often individuals competed for their teams.  For instance, a team may carry a player or two with a rating much higher than the average rating of the rest of the team, but if the team never or seldom got these people in matches in the previous season, their impact on team placement can be minimal.  As another example, some teams carry up to 15 players on their rosters, but a core of about 8-10 people play most of the matches.  That team's strength would be best viewed as the average strength of those 8-10 players.

Team placement process
The ATL Committee's placement process begins by arraying all teams from top to bottom, sometimes based on historical placement if teams retain the same rosters.  From there, the ATL Committee uses the tools and strategies listed above to arrange teams by division.

Focus on fun
Finally, the ATL Committee's focus is not to determine which teams are the best in the league.  Instead, our focus is to attempt to give every team an opportunity to test itself against similarly-skilled competition.


 

© 2017 Austin Tennis League. All rights reserved.